Collapse to view only § 30506. Rule of construction

§ 30501. FindingsCongress makes the following findings:
(1) The incidence of violence motivated by the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of the victim poses a serious national problem.
(2) Such violence disrupts the tranquility and safety of communities and is deeply divisive.
(3) State and local authorities are now and will continue to be responsible for prosecuting the overwhelming majority of violent crimes in the United States, including violent crimes motivated by bias. These authorities can carry out their responsibilities more effectively with greater Federal assistance.
(4) Existing Federal law is inadequate to address this problem.
(5) A prominent characteristic of a violent crime motivated by bias is that it devastates not just the actual victim and the family and friends of the victim, but frequently savages the community sharing the traits that caused the victim to be selected.
(6) Such violence substantially affects interstate commerce in many ways, including the following:
(A) The movement of members of targeted groups is impeded, and members of such groups are forced to move across State lines to escape the incidence or risk of such violence.
(B) Members of targeted groups are prevented from purchasing goods and services, obtaining or sustaining employment, or participating in other commercial activity.
(C) Perpetrators cross State lines to commit such violence.
(D) Channels, facilities, and instrumentalities of interstate commerce are used to facilitate the commission of such violence.
(E) Such violence is committed using articles that have traveled in interstate commerce.
(7) For generations, the institutions of slavery and involuntary servitude were defined by the race, color, and ancestry of those held in bondage. Slavery and involuntary servitude were enforced, both prior to and after the adoption of the 13th amendment to the Constitution of the United States, through widespread public and private violence directed at persons because of their race, color, or ancestry, or perceived race, color, or ancestry. Accordingly, eliminating racially motivated violence is an important means of eliminating, to the extent possible, the badges, incidents, and relics of slavery and involuntary servitude.
(8) Both at the time when the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution of the United States were adopted, and continuing to date, members of certain religious and national origin groups were and are perceived to be distinct “races”. Thus, in order to eliminate, to the extent possible, the badges, incidents, and relics of slavery, it is necessary to prohibit assaults on the basis of real or perceived religions or national origins, at least to the extent such religions or national origins were regarded as races at the time of the adoption of the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments to the Constitution of the United States.
(9) Federal jurisdiction over certain violent crimes motivated by bias enables Federal, State, and local authorities to work together as partners in the investigation and prosecution of such crimes.
(10) The problem of crimes motivated by bias is sufficiently serious, widespread, and interstate in nature as to warrant Federal assistance to States, local jurisdictions, and Indian tribes.
(Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, § 4702, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2835.)
§ 30502. Definitions
In this division—
(1) the term “crime of violence” has the meaning given that term in section 16 of title 18;
(2) the term “hate crime” has the meaning given that term in section 280003(a) of the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (Public Law 103–322; 108 Stat. 2096), as amended by this Act;
(3) the term “local” means a county, city, town, township, parish, village, or other general purpose political subdivision of a State; and
(4) the term “State” includes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and any other territory or possession of the United States.
(Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, § 4703(b), Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2836.)
§ 30503. Support for criminal investigations and prosecutions by State, local, and tribal law enforcement officials
(a) Assistance other than financial assistance
(1) In general
At the request of a State, local, or tribal law enforcement agency, the Attorney General may provide technical, forensic, prosecutorial, or any other form of assistance in the criminal investigation or prosecution of any crime that—
(A) constitutes a crime of violence;
(B) constitutes a felony under the State, local, or tribal laws; and
(C) is motivated by prejudice based on the actual or perceived race, color, religion, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability of the victim, or is a violation of the State, local, or tribal hate crime laws.
(2) Priority
(b) Grants
(1) In general
(2) Office of Justice Programs
(3) Application
(A) In general
(B) Date for submission
(C) Requirements
A State, local, and tribal law enforcement agency applying for a grant under this subsection shall—
(i) describe the extraordinary purposes for which the grant is needed;
(ii) certify that the State, local government, or Indian tribe lacks the resources necessary to investigate or prosecute the hate crime;
(iii) demonstrate that, in developing a plan to implement the grant, the State, local, and tribal law enforcement agency has consulted and coordinated with nonprofit, nongovernmental victim services programs that have experience in providing services to victims of hate crimes; and
(iv) certify that any Federal funds received under this subsection will be used to supplement, not supplant, non-Federal funds that would otherwise be available for activities funded under this subsection.
(4) Deadline
(5) Grant amount
(6) Report
(7) Authorization of appropriations
(Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, § 4704, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2837.)
§ 30504. Grant program
(a) Authority to award grants
(b) Authorization of appropriations
(Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, § 4705, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2838.)
§ 30505. Severability

If any provision of this division, an amendment made by this division, or the application of such provision or amendment to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this division, the amendments made by this division, and the application of the provisions of such to any person or circumstance shall not be affected thereby.

(Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, § 4709, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2841.)
§ 30506. Rule of construction
For purposes of construing this division and the amendments made by this division the following shall apply:
(1) In general
(2) Violent acts
(3) Construction and application
Nothing in this division, or an amendment made by this division, shall be construed or applied in a manner that infringes any rights under the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Nor shall anything in this division, or an amendment made by this division, be construed or applied in a manner that substantially burdens a person’s exercise of religion (regardless of whether compelled by, or central to, a system of religious belief), speech, expression, or association, unless the Government demonstrates that application of the burden to the person is in furtherance of a compelling governmental interest and is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest, if such exercise of religion, speech, expression, or association was not intended to—
(A) plan or prepare for an act of physical violence; or
(B) incite an imminent act of physical violence against another.
(4) Free expression
(5) First amendment
(6) Constitutional protections
(Pub. L. 111–84, div. E, § 4710, Oct. 28, 2009, 123 Stat. 2841.)
§ 30507. Jabara-Heyer NO HATE Act
(a) Short title
(b) FindingsCongress finds the following:
(1) The incidence of violence known as hate crimes, or crimes motivated by bias, poses a serious national problem.
(2) According to data obtained by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the incidence of such violence increased in 2019, the most recent year for which data is available.
(3) In 1990, Congress enacted the Hate Crime Statistics Act (Public Law 101–275; 28 U.S.C. 534 note) 1
1 See References in Text note below.
to provide the Federal Government, law enforcement agencies, and the public with data regarding the incidence of hate crime. The Hate Crime Statistics Act and the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act (division E of Public Law 111–84; 123 Stat. 2835) 1 have enabled Federal authorities to understand and, where appropriate, investigate and prosecute hate crimes.
(4) A more complete understanding of the national problem posed by hate crime is in the public interest and supports the Federal interest in eradicating bias-motivated violence referenced in section 249(b)(1)(C) of title 18.
(5) However, a complete understanding of the national problem posed by hate crimes is hindered by incomplete data from Federal, State, and local jurisdictions through the Uniform Crime Reports program authorized under section 534 of title 28 and administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
(6) Multiple factors contribute to the provision of inaccurate and incomplete data regarding the incidence of hate crime through the Uniform Crime Reports program. A significant contributing factor is the quality and quantity of training that State and local law enforcement agencies receive on the identification and reporting of suspected bias-motivated crimes.
(7) The problem of crimes motivated by bias is sufficiently serious, widespread, and interstate in nature as to warrant Federal financial assistance to States and local jurisdictions.
(8) Federal financial assistance with regard to certain violent crimes motivated by bias enables Federal, State, and local authorities to work together as partners in the investigation and prosecution of such crimes.
(c) DefinitionsIn this section:
(1) Hate crime
(2) Priority agencyThe term “priority agency” means—
(A) a law enforcement agency of a unit of local government that serves a population of not less than 100,000, as computed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; or
(B) a law enforcement agency of a unit of local government that—
(i) serves a population of not less than 50,000 and less than 100,000, as computed by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and
(ii) has reported no hate crimes through the Uniform Crime Reports program in each of the 3 most recent calendar years for which such data is available.
(3) State
(4) Uniform Crime ReportsThe term “Uniform Crime Reports” means the reports authorized under section 534 of title 28 and administered by the Federal Bureau of Investigation that compile nationwide criminal statistics for use—
(A) in law enforcement administration, operation, and management; and
(B) to assess the nature and type of crime in the United States.
(5) Unit of local government
(d) Reporting of hate crimes
(1) Implementation grants
(A) In general
(B) Priority
(2) Reporting
(A) Compliance
(i) In general
(ii) Extensions; waiverThe Attorney General—(I) may provide a 120-day extension to a State or unit of local government that is making good faith efforts to comply with clause (i); and(II) shall waive the requirements of clause (i) if compliance with that subparagraph by a State or unit of local government would be unconstitutional under the constitution of the State or of the State in which the unit of local government is located, respectively.
(B) Failure to comply
(e) Grants for State-run hate crime hotlines
(1) Grants authorized
(A) In general
(B) Grant period
(2) Hotline requirementsA State shall ensure, with respect to a hotline funded by a grant under paragraph (1), that—
(A) the hotline directs individuals to—
(i) law enforcement if appropriate; and
(ii) local support services;
(B) any personally identifiable information that an individual provides to an agency of the State through the hotline is not directly or indirectly disclosed, without the consent of the individual, to—
(i) any other agency of that State;
(ii) any other State;
(iii) the Federal Government; or
(iv) any other person or entity;
(C) the staff members who operate the hotline are trained to be knowledgeable about—
(i) applicable Federal, State, and local hate crime laws; and
(ii) local law enforcement resources and applicable local support services; and
(D) the hotline is accessible to—
(i) individuals with limited English proficiency, where appropriate; and
(ii) individuals with disabilities.
(3) Best practices
(f) Information collection by States and units of local government
(1) DefinitionsIn this subsection:
(A) Covered agencyThe term “covered agency” means—
(i) a State law enforcement agency; and
(ii) a priority agency.
(B) Eligible entityThe term “eligible entity” means—
(i) a State; or
(ii) a unit of local government that has a priority agency.
(2) Grants
(A) In generalThe Attorney General may make grants to eligible entities to assist covered agencies within the jurisdiction of the eligible entity in conducting law enforcement activities or crime reduction programs to prevent, address, or otherwise respond to hate crime, particularly as those activities or programs relate to reporting hate crimes through the Uniform Crime Reports program, including—
(i) adopting a policy on identifying, investigating, and reporting hate crimes;
(ii) developing a standardized system of collecting, analyzing, and reporting the incidence of hate crime;
(iii) establishing a unit specialized in identifying, investigating, and reporting hate crimes;
(iv) engaging in community relations functions related to hate crime prevention and education such as—(I) establishing a liaison with formal community-based organizations or leaders; and(II) conducting public meetings or educational forums on the impact of hate crimes, services available to hate crime victims, and the relevant Federal, State, and local laws pertaining to hate crimes; and
(v) providing hate crime trainings for agency personnel.
(B) Subgrants
(3) Information required of States and units of local government
(A) In generalFor each fiscal year in which a State or unit of local government receives a grant or subgrant under paragraph (2), the State or unit of local government shall—
(i) collect information from each law enforcement agency that receives funding from the grant or subgrant summarizing the law enforcement activities or crime reduction programs conducted by the agency to prevent, address, or otherwise respond to hate crime, particularly as those activities or programs relate to reporting hate crimes through the Uniform Crime Reports program; and
(ii) submit to the Attorney General a report containing the information collected under clause (i).
(B) Semiannual law enforcement agency report
(i) In general
(ii) ContentsIn a report submitted under clause (i), a law enforcement agency shall, at a minimum, disclose—(I) whether the agency has adopted a policy on identifying, investigating, and reporting hate crimes;(II) whether the agency has developed a standardized system of collecting, analyzing, and reporting the incidence of hate crime;(III) whether the agency has established a unit specialized in identifying, investigating, and reporting hate crimes;(IV) whether the agency engages in community relations functions related to hate crime, such as—(aa) establishing a liaison with formal community-based organizations or leaders; and(bb) conducting public meetings or educational forums on the impact of hate crime, services available to hate crime victims, and the relevant Federal, State, and local laws pertaining to hate crime; and(V) the number of hate crime trainings for agency personnel, including the duration of the trainings, conducted by the agency during the reporting period.
(4) Compliance and redirection of funds
(A) In general
(B) Extensions; waiverThe Attorney General—
(i) may provide a 120-day extension to a State or unit of local government that is making good faith efforts to collect the information required under paragraph (3); and
(ii) shall waive the requirements of paragraph (3) for a State or unit of local government if compliance with that subsection by the State or unit of local government would be unconstitutional under the constitution of the State or of the State in which the unit of local government is located, respectively.
(g) Requirements of the Attorney General
(1) Information collection and analysis; reportIn order to improve the accuracy of data regarding the incidence of hate crime provided through the Uniform Crime Reports program, and promote a more complete understanding of the national problem posed by hate crime, the Attorney General shall—
(A) collect and analyze the information provided by States and units of local government under subsection (f) for the purpose of developing policies related to the provision of accurate data obtained under the Hate Crime Statistics Act (Public Law 101–275; 28 U.S.C. 534 note) 1 by the Federal Bureau of Investigation; and
(B) for each calendar year beginning after May 20, 2021, publish and submit to Congress a report based on the information collected and analyzed under subparagraph (A).
(2) Contents of reportA report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include—
(A) a qualitative analysis of the relationship between—
(i) the number of hate crimes reported by State law enforcement agencies or other law enforcement agencies that received funding from a grant or subgrant awarded under paragraph (2) through the Uniform Crime Reports program; and
(ii) the nature and extent of law enforcement activities or crime reduction programs conducted by those agencies to prevent, address, or otherwise respond to hate crime; and
(B) a quantitative analysis of the number of State law enforcement agencies and other law enforcement agencies that received funding from a grant or subgrant awarded under paragraph (2) that have—
(i) adopted a policy on identifying, investigating, and reporting hate crimes;
(ii) developed a standardized system of collecting, analyzing, and reporting the incidence of hate crime;
(iii) established a unit specialized in identifying, investigating, and reporting hate crimes;
(iv) engaged in community relations functions related to hate crime, such as—(I) establishing a liaison with formal community-based organizations or leaders; and(II) conducting public meetings or educational forums on the impact of hate crime, services available to hate crime victims, and the relevant Federal, State, and local laws pertaining to hate crime; and
(v) conducted hate crime trainings for agency personnel during the reporting period, including—(I) the total number of trainings conducted by each agency; and(II) the duration of the trainings described in subclause (I).
(h) Omitted
(Pub. L. 117–13, § 5, May 20, 2021, 135 Stat. 266.)