Collapse to view only § 51.1011 - Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements.
- § 51.1000 - Definitions.
- § 51.1001 - Applicability of part 51.
- § 51.1002 - Classifications and reclassifications.
- § 51.1003 - Attainment plan due dates and submission requirements.
- § 51.1004 - Attainment dates.
- § 51.1005 - Attainment date extensions.
- § 51.1006 - Optional PM2.5 precursor demonstrations
- § 51.1007 - [Reserved]
- § 51.1008 - Emissions inventory requirements.
- § 51.1009 - Moderate area attainment plan control strategy requirements.
- § 51.1010 - Serious area attainment plan control strategy requirements.
- § 51.1011 - Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements.
- § 51.1012 - Reasonable further progress (RFP) requirements.
- § 51.1013 - Quantitative milestone requirements.
- § 51.1014 - Contingency measure requirements.
- § 51.1015 - Clean data requirements.
- § 51.1016 - Continued applicability of the FIP and SIP requirements pertaining to interstate transport under CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and (ii) after revocation of the 1997 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
§ 51.1000 - Definitions.
The following definitions apply for purposes of this subpart. Any term not defined herein shall have the meaning as defined in 40 CFR 51.100 or Clean Air Act section 302.
Act means the Clean Air Act as codified at 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q (2003).
Additional feasible measure is any control measure that otherwise meets the definition of “best available control measure” (BACM) but can only be implemented in whole or in part beginning 4 years after the date of reclassification of an area as Serious and no later than the statutory attainment date for the area.
Additional reasonable measure is any control measure that otherwise meets the definition of “reasonably available control measure” (RACM) but can only be implemented in whole or in part during the period beginning 4 years after the effective date of designation of a nonattainment area and no later than the end of the sixth calendar year following the effective date of designation of the area.
Applicable annual standard is the annual PM
Applicable attainment date means the latest statutory date by which an area is required to attain a particular PM
Applicable 24-hour standard is the 24-hour PM
Attainment projected inventory for the nonattainment area means the projected emissions of direct PM
Average-season-day emissions means the sum of all emissions during the applicable season divided by the number of days in that season.
Base year inventory for the nonattainment area means the actual emissions of direct PM
Best available control measure (BACM) is any technologically and economically feasible control measure that can be implemented in whole or in part within 4 years after the date of reclassification of a Moderate PM
Date of designation means the effective date of a PM
Date of reclassification means the effective date of a PM
Direct PM
Implemented means adopted by the state, fully approved into the SIP by the EPA, and requiring expeditious compliance by affected sources with installation and/or operation of any equipment, control device, process change, or other emission reduction activity.
Major stationary source means any stationary source of air pollutant(s) that emits, or has the potential to emit 100 tons per year or more of direct PM
Mobile source means mobile sources as defined by 40 CFR 51.50.
Most stringent measure (MSM) is any permanent and enforceable control measure that achieves the most stringent emissions reductions in direct PM
Nonpoint source means nonpoint sources as defined by 40 CFR 51.50.
PM
PM
PM
PM
Point source means point sources as defined by 40 CFR 51.50.
Precursor demonstration means an optional set of analyses provided by a state that are designed to show that emissions of a particular PM
Reasonable further progress (RFP) means such annual incremental reductions in emissions of direct PM
Reasonably available control measure (RACM) is any technologically and economically feasible measure that can be implemented in whole or in part within 4 years after the effective date of designation of a PM
RFP projected emissions means the estimated emissions for direct PM
Subpart 1 means subpart 1 of part D of title I of the Act.
Subpart 4 means subpart 4 of part D of title I of the Act.
§ 51.1001 - Applicability of part 51.
The provisions in subparts A through X of this part apply to areas for purposes of the PM
§ 51.1002 - Classifications and reclassifications.
(a) Initial classification as Moderate PM
(b) Reclassification as Serious PM
(1) The EPA shall reclassify as Serious through notice-and-comment rulemaking any Moderate PM
(2) A Moderate PM
§ 51.1003 - Attainment plan due dates and submission requirements.
(a) Nonattainment areas initially classified as Moderate. (1) For any area designated as nonattainment and initially classified as Moderate for a PM
(i) Base year emissions inventory requirements set forth at § 51.1008(a)(1);
(ii) Attainment projected emissions inventory requirements set forth at § 51.1008(a)(2);
(iii) Moderate area attainment plan control strategy requirements set forth at § 51.1009;
(iv) Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements set forth at § 51.1011;
(v) Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) requirements set forth at § 51.1012;
(vi) Quantitative milestone requirements set forth at § 51.1013;
(vii) Contingency measure requirements set forth at § 51.1014; and,
(viii) Nonattainment new source review plan requirements pursuant to § 51.165.
(2) The state(s) shall submit its Moderate area attainment plan to the EPA no later than 18 months from the effective date of designation of the area.
(b) Nonattainment areas reclassified to Serious. (1) For any nonattainment area reclassified to Serious for a PM
(i) Base year emissions inventory requirements set forth at § 51.1008(b)(1);
(ii) Attainment projected emissions inventory requirements set forth at § 51.1008(b)(2);
(iii) Serious area attainment plan control strategy requirements set forth at § 51.1010;
(iv) Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements set forth at § 51.1011;
(v) Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) requirements set forth at § 51.1012;
(vi) Quantitative milestone requirements set forth at § 51.1013;
(vii) Contingency measure requirements set forth at § 51.1014; and,
(viii) Nonattainment new source review plan requirements pursuant to § 51.165.
(2) The state(s) shall submit its Serious area attainment plan to the EPA according to the following schedule:
(i) Discretionary reclassification. (A) For any nonattainment area reclassified to Serious for a particular PM
(1) Base year emissions inventory requirements set forth at § 51.1008(b)(1);
(2) Serious area attainment plan control strategy requirements set forth at § 51.1010(a)(1) through (4); and,
(3) Nonattainment new source review plan requirements pursuant to § 51.165.
(B) The state(s) shall submit to the EPA the portion of the Serious area attainment plan that meets the requirements set forth at paragraphs (b)(1)(ii), and (b)(1)(iv) through (vii) of this section to the EPA by a date that is no later than 4 years after the effective date of reclassification, or 2 years prior to the attainment date, whichever is earlier.
(ii) Mandatory reclassification. For any nonattainment area reclassified to Serious for a particular PM
(iii) If the state(s) submits to the EPA a request for a Serious area attainment date extension simultaneous with the Serious area attainment plan due under paragraph (b)(1) of this section, such a plan shall meet the most stringent measure (MSM) requirements set forth at § 51.1010(b) in addition to the BACM and BACT and additional feasible measure requirements set forth at § 51.1010(a).
(c) Serious nonattainment areas subject to CAA section 189(d) for failing to attain the PM
(i) Emissions inventory requirements set forth at § 51.1008(c)(1);
(ii) Emissions inventory requirements set forth at § 51.1008(c)(2);
(iii) Serious area attainment plan control strategy requirements set forth at § 51.1010;
(iv) Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements set forth at § 51.1011;
(v) Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) requirements set forth at § 51.1012;
(vi) Quantitative milestone requirements set forth at § 51.1013;
(vii) Contingency measure requirements set forth at § 51.1014; and
(viii) Nonattainment new source review plan requirements pursuant to § 51.165.
(2) The state(s) shall submit to the EPA the revised attainment plan meeting the requirements set forth at paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section no later than 12 months from the applicable Serious area attainment date that was previously missed.
(d) Any attainment plan submitted to the EPA under this section shall establish motor vehicle emissions budgets for the projected attainment year for the area, if applicable. The state shall develop such budgets according to the requirements of the transportation conformity rule as they apply to PM
§ 51.1004 - Attainment dates.
(a) The state shall submit a projected attainment date as part of its attainment plan submission under § 51.1003 for any PM
(1) Nonattainment areas initially classified as Moderate.
(i) Except for nonattainment areas that meet the criterion under paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, the projected attainment date for a Moderate PM
(ii) The projected attainment date for a Moderate PM
(2) Nonattainment areas reclassified to Serious. (i) Except for nonattainment areas that meet the criterion under paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section, the projected attainment date for a Serious PM
(ii) A state that submits an attainment plan that demonstrates that a Serious PM
(3) Serious nonattainment areas subject to CAA section 189(d) for failing to attain by the applicable Serious area attainment date. The projected attainment date for a Serious PM
(b) Except for attainment plans that meet the conditions of paragraphs (a)(1)(ii) or (a)(3) of this section, the Administrator shall approve an attainment date at the same time and in the same manner in which the Administrator approves the attainment plan for the area.
(1) In accordance with paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, if a state demonstrates that a Moderate PM
(2) [Reserved]
§ 51.1005 - Attainment date extensions.
(a) Nonattainment areas initially classified as Moderate. (1) A state with a Moderate PM
(i) The state has complied with all requirements and commitments pertaining to the area in the applicable implementation plan;
(ii) For an area designated nonattainment for a particular 24-hour PM
(iii) For an area designated nonattainment for a particular annual PM
(2) The applicable implementation plan for a Moderate PM
(3) A Moderate area 1-year attainment date extension runs from January 1 to December 31 of the year following the year that includes the applicable attainment date.
(4) A state with a Moderate area that received an initial 1-year attainment date extension may apply for a second 1-year attainment date extension for the area if the state meets the conditions described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section for the first 1-year extension year.
(b) Nonattainment areas reclassified as Serious. (1) A state may apply for one attainment date extension not to exceed 5 years for a Serious nonattainment area if the following conditions are met:
(i) The state demonstrates that attainment of the applicable PM
(ii) The state has complied with all requirements and commitments pertaining to the area in the applicable implementation plan; and,
(iii) The state demonstrates that the attainment plan for the area includes the most stringent measures (MSM) that are included in the attainment plan of any state or are achieved in practice in any state, and can feasibly be implemented in the area consistent with § 51.1010(b).
(2) At the time of application for an attainment date extension, the state shall submit to the EPA a Serious area attainment plan that meets the following requirements:
(i) Base year and attainment projected emissions inventory requirements set forth at § 51.1008(b);
(ii) Most stringent measures (MSM) requirement described under paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section and § 51.1010(b), and best available control measures not previously submitted;
(iii) Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements set forth at § 51.1011 that justify the state's conclusion under paragraph (b)(1)(i) of this section, and that demonstrate attainment as expeditiously as practicable;
(iv) Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) requirements set forth at § 51.1012;
(v) Quantitative milestone requirements set forth at § 51.1013;
(vi) Contingency measure requirements set forth at § 51.1014; and,
(vii) Nonattainment new source review plan requirements pursuant to § 51.165.
(3) The applicable implementation plan for a Serious PM
(4) The applicable implementation plan for a Serious PM
(5) A state applying for an attainment date extension for a Serious nonattainment area under § 51.1004(a)(2)(ii) shall submit to the EPA a request for an extension at the same time as it submits the Serious area attainment plan due under § 51.1003(b)(1).
(6) A state applying for an attainment date extension for a Serious nonattainment area subsequent to submitting an initial Serious area attainment plan that demonstrated attainment of the NAAQS by the applicable attainment date consistent with § 51.1004(a)(2)(i) at the time of submission may apply for such an extension no later than 60 calendar days prior to the approved attainment date for the area or, in the absence of an approved attainment date, no later than 60 calendar days prior to the applicable statutory attainment date for the area.
(c) Serious nonattainment areas subject to CAA section 189(d) for failing to attain by the applicable Serious area attainment date. If a Serious area fails to attain a particular PM
(d) For any attainment date extension request submitted pursuant to this section, the requesting state (or states) shall submit a written request and evidence of compliance with these regulations which includes both of the following:
(1) Evidence that all control measures submitted in the applicable attainment plan have been implemented, and
(2) Evidence that the area has made emission reduction progress that represents reasonable further progress toward timely attainment of the applicable PM
(e) For a PM
§ 51.1006 - Optional PM2.5 precursor demonstrations
(a) A state may elect to submit to the EPA one or more precursor demonstrations for a specific nonattainment area. The analyses conducted in support of any precursor demonstration must be based on precursor emissions attributed to sources and activities in the nonattainment area.
(1) A comprehensive precursor demonstration must show that emissions of a particular precursor from all existing stationary, area, and mobile sources located in the nonattainment area do not contribute significantly to PM
(i) Concentration-based contribution analysis. The comprehensive precursor demonstration must evaluate the contribution of a particular precursor to PM
(ii) Sensitivity-based contribution analysis. If the concentration-based contribution analysis does not support a finding of insignificant contribution, based on the facts and circumstances of the area, then the state may choose to submit an analysis evaluating the sensitivity of PM
(iii) If a comprehensive precursor demonstration is approved by the EPA, the state will not be required to control emissions of the relevant precursor from existing sources in the current attainment plan.
(2) A major stationary source precursor demonstration must show that emissions of a particular precursor from all existing major stationary sources located in the nonattainment area do not contribute significantly to PM
(i) Concentration-based contribution analysis. The major stationary source precursor demonstration must evaluate the contribution of major source emissions of a particular precursor to PM
(ii) Sensitivity-based contribution analysis. If the concentration-based contribution analysis does not support a finding of insignificant contribution, based on the facts and circumstances of the area, then the state may choose to submit an analysis evaluating the sensitivity of PM
(iii) If a major stationary source precursor demonstration is approved by the EPA, the state will not be required to control emissions of the relevant precursor from existing major stationary sources in the current attainment plan.
(3)(i) A NNSR precursor demonstration must evaluate the sensitivity of PM
(ii) If a NNSR precursor demonstration for a particular PM
(b) If an area with one or more precursor demonstrations approved by the EPA is required to submit another PM
§ 51.1007 - [Reserved]
§ 51.1008 - Emissions inventory requirements.
(a) For any nonattainment area initially classified as Moderate, the state shall submit to the EPA all of the following:
(1) A base year inventory for the nonattainment area for all emissions sources that meets the following minimum criteria:
(i) The inventory year shall be one of the 3 years for which monitored data were used for designations or another technically appropriate inventory year if justified by the state in the plan submission.
(ii) The inventory shall include actual emissions of all sources within the nonattainment area.
(iii) The emissions values shall be either annual total emissions, average-season-day emissions, or both, as appropriate for the relevant PM
(iv) The inventory shall include direct PM
(v) The state shall report emissions as point sources according to the point source emissions thresholds of the Air Emissions Reporting Requirements (AERR), 40 CFR part 51, subpart A.
(vi) The detail of the emissions inventory shall be consistent with the detail and data elements required by 40 CFR part 51, subpart A.
(2) An attainment projected inventory for the nonattainment area that meets the following minimum criteria:
(i) The year of the projected inventory shall be the most expeditious year for which projected emissions show modeled PM
(ii) The emissions values shall be projected emissions of the same sources included in the base year inventory for the nonattainment area (i.e., those only within the nonattainment area) and any new sources. The state shall include in this inventory projected emissions growth and contraction from both controls and other causes during the relevant period.
(iii) The temporal period of emissions shall be the same temporal period (annual, average-season-day, or both) as the base year inventory for the nonattainment area.
(iv) Consistent with the base year inventory for the nonattainment area, the inventory shall include direct PM
(v) The same sources reported as point sources in the base year inventory for the nonattainment area shall be included as point sources in the attainment projected inventory for the nonattainment area. Stationary nonpoint and mobile source projected emissions shall be provided using the same detail (e.g., state, county, and process codes) as the base year inventory for the nonattainment area.
(vi) The same detail of the emissions included shall be consistent with the level of detail and data elements as in the base year inventory for the nonattainment area (i.e., as required by 40 CFR part 41, subpart A).
(b) For any nonattainment area reclassified as Serious, the state shall submit to the EPA all of the following:
(1) For purposes of meeting the emissions inventory requirements of CAA section 172(c)(3), a base year inventory for the nonattainment area for all emissions sources that meets the requirements listed under paragraphs (a)(1) (ii) through (a)(1)(vi) of this section. In addition, the inventory shall use the Serious area definition of a major source listed under § 51.165(a)(1)(iv)(A), and(a)(1)(vii) and (viii), and consistent with Table 1 of Appendix A to subpart A of this part in determining sources to include as point sources. Finally, the inventory year shall be one of the 3 years for which monitored data were used for reclassification to Serious, or another technically appropriate inventory year if justified by the state in the plan submission.
(2) An attainment projected inventory for the nonattainment area that meets the criteria listed under paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(c) Serious nonattainment areas subject to CAA section 189(d) for failing to attain a PM
(1) For purposes of meeting the emissions inventory requirements of CAA section 172(c)(3), a base year inventory for the nonattainment area for all emissions sources that meets the requirements listed under paragraphs (a)(1) (ii) through (a)(1)(vi) of this section. In addition, the inventory shall use the Serious area definition of a major source listed under § 51.165(a)(1)(iv)(A)(vii) and (viii) and consistent with Table 1 of Appendix A to subpart A of this part in determining sources to include as point sources. The inventory year shall be one of the 3 years for which monitored data were used to determine that the area failed to attain the PM
(2) An attainment projected inventory for the nonattainment area as defined by § 51.1000(e) and that meets the criteria listed under paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
§ 51.1009 - Moderate area attainment plan control strategy requirements.
(a) The state shall identify, adopt, and implement control measures, including control technologies, on sources of direct PM
(1) The state shall identify all sources of direct PM
(2) The state shall identify all potential control measures to reduce emissions from all sources of direct PM
(i) The state is not required to identify and evaluate potential control measures to reduce emissions of a particular PM
(ii) The state is not required to identify and evaluate potential control measures to reduce emissions of a particular PM
(3) For any potential control measure identified under paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the state may make a demonstration that such measure is not technologically or economically feasible to implement in whole or in part by the end of the sixth calendar year following the effective date of designation of the area, and the state may eliminate such whole or partial measure from further consideration under this paragraph.
(i) For purposes of evaluating the technological feasibility of a potential control measure, the state may consider factors including but not limited to a source's processes and operating procedures, raw materials, physical plant layout, and potential environmental impacts such as increased water pollution, waste disposal, and energy requirements.
(ii) For purposes of evaluating the economic feasibility of a potential control measure, the state may consider factors including but not limited to capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, and cost effectiveness of the measure.
(iii) The state must submit to the EPA as part of its Moderate area attainment plan a detailed written justification for eliminating from further consideration any potential control measure identified under paragraph (a)(2) of this section on the basis of technological or economic infeasibility.
(4) The state shall use air quality modeling that meets the requirements of § 51.1011(a) and that accounts for emissions reductions estimated due to all technologically and economically feasible control measures identified for sources of direct PM
(i) If the state demonstrates through air quality modeling that the area can attain the applicable PM
(A) Any control measure identified for adoption and implementation under this paragraph that can be implemented in whole or in part by 4 years after the effective date of designation of the Moderate PM
(B) Any control measure identified for adoption and implementation under this paragraph that can only be implemented in whole or in part during the period beginning 4 years after the effective date of designation of the Moderate PM
(ii) If the state demonstrates that the area cannot practicably attain the applicable PM
(A) Any control measure identified for adoption and implementation under this paragraph that can be implemented in whole or in part by 4 years after the effective date of designation of the Moderate PM
(B) Any control measure identified for adoption and implementation under this paragraph that can only be implemented in whole or in part during the period beginning 4 years after the effective date of designation of the Moderate PM
(b) The state shall adopt control measures, including control technologies, on sources of direct PM
(c) For new or revised source emissions limitations on sources of direct PM
§ 51.1010 - Serious area attainment plan control strategy requirements.
(a) The state shall identify, adopt, and implement best available control measures, including control technologies, on sources of direct PM
(1) The state shall identify all sources of direct PM
(2) The state shall identify all potential control measures to reduce emissions from all sources of direct PM
(i) The state shall survey other NAAQS nonattainment areas in the U.S. and identify any measures for direct PM
(ii) The state is not required to identify and evaluate potential control measures to reduce emissions of a particular PM
(iii) The state is not required to identify and evaluate potential control measures to reduce emissions of a particular PM
(3) The state may make a demonstration that any measure identified under paragraph (a)(2) of this section is not technologically or economically feasible to implement in whole or in part by the end of the tenth calendar year following the effective date of designation of the area, and may eliminate such whole or partial measure from further consideration under this paragraph.
(i) For purposes of evaluating the technological feasibility of a potential control measure, the state may consider factors including but not limited to a source's processes and operating procedures, raw materials, physical plant layout, and potential environmental impacts such as increased water pollution, waste disposal, and energy requirements.
(ii) For purposes of evaluating the economic feasibility of a potential control measure, the state may consider capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, and cost effectiveness of the measure.
(iii) The state shall submit to the EPA as part of its Serious area attainment plan submission a detailed written justification for eliminating from further consideration any potential control measure identified under paragraph (a)(2) of this section on the basis of technological or economic infeasibility. The state shall provide as part of its written justification an explanation of how its criteria for determining the technological and economic feasibility of potential control measures under paragraphs (a)(3)(i) and (ii) of this section are more stringent than its criteria for determining the technological and economic feasibility of potential control measures under § 51.1009(a)(3)(i) and (ii) for the same sources in the PM
(4) Except as provided under paragraph (a)(3) of this section, the state shall adopt and implement all potential control measures identified under paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(i) Any control measure that can be implemented in whole or in part by the end of the fourth year following the date of reclassification of the area to Serious shall be considered a best available control measure for the area. Any such control measure that is also a control technology for a stationary source in the area shall be considered a best available control technology for the area.
(ii) Any control measure that can be implemented in whole or in part between the end of the fourth year following the date of reclassification of the area to Serious and the applicable attainment date for the area shall be considered an additional feasible measure.
(5) The state shall use air quality modeling that meets the requirements of § 51.1011(b) and that accounts for emissions reductions estimated due to all best available control measures, including best available control technologies, and additional feasible measures identified for sources of direct PM
(b) For a Serious PM
(1) The state shall identify all sources of direct PM
(2) The state shall identify all potential control measures to reduce emissions from all sources of direct PM
(i) For the sources and source categories represented in the emission inventory for the nonattainment area, the state shall identify the most stringent measures for reducing direct PM
(ii) The state shall reconsider and reassess any measures previously rejected by the state during the development of any previous Moderate area or Serious area attainment plan control strategy for the area.
(3) The state may make a demonstration that a measure identified under paragraph (b)(2) of this section is not technologically or economically feasible to implement in whole or in part by 5 years after the applicable attainment date for the area, and may eliminate such whole or partial measure from further consideration under this paragraph.
(i) For purposes of evaluating the technological feasibility of a potential control measure, the state may consider factors including but not limited to a source's processes and operating procedures, raw materials, physical plant layout, and potential environmental impacts such as increased water pollution, waste disposal, and energy requirements.
(ii) For purposes of evaluating the economic feasibility of a potential control measure, the state may consider capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, and cost effectiveness of the measure.
(iii) The state shall submit to the EPA as part of its Serious area attainment plan submission a detailed written justification for eliminating from further consideration any potential control measure identified under paragraph (b)(2) of this section on the basis of technological or economic infeasibility.
(4) Except as provided under paragraph (b)(3) of this section, the state shall adopt and implement all control measures identified under paragraph (b)(2) of this section that collectively shall achieve attainment as expeditiously as practicable but no later than 5 years after the applicable attainment date for the area.
(5) The state shall use air quality modeling that meets the requirements of § 51.1011(b) and that accounts for emissions reductions estimated due to all most stringent measures; best available control measures, including best available control technologies; and additional feasible measures identified for sources of direct PM
(c) For a Serious PM
(1) The state shall identify all sources of direct PM
(2) The state shall identify all potential control measures to reduce emissions from all sources of direct PM
(i) For the sources and source categories represented in the emission inventory for the nonattainment area, the state shall identify the most stringent measures for reducing direct PM
(ii) The state shall reconsider and reassess any measures previously rejected by the state during the development of any Moderate area or Serious area attainment plan control strategy for the area.
(3) The state may make a demonstration that a measure identified under paragraph (c)(2) of this section is not technologically or economically feasible to implement in whole or in part within 5 years or such longer period as the EPA may determine is appropriate after the EPA's determination that the area failed to attain by the Serious area attainment date, and may eliminate such whole or partial measure from further consideration under this paragraph.
(i) For purposes of evaluating the technological feasibility of a potential control measure, the state may consider factors including but not limited to a source's processes and operating procedures, raw materials, physical plant layout, and potential environmental impacts such as increased water pollution, waste disposal, and energy requirements.
(ii) For purposes of evaluating the economic feasibility of a potential control measure, the state may consider capital costs, operating and maintenance costs, and cost effectiveness of the measure.
(iii) The state shall submit to the EPA as part of its Serious area attainment plan submission a detailed written justification for eliminating from further consideration any potential control measure identified under paragraph (c)(2) of this section on the basis of technological or economic infeasibility.
(4) Except as provided under paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the state shall adopt and implement all control measures identified under paragraph (c)(2) of this section that collectively achieve attainment of the standard as expeditiously as practicable pursuant to § 51.1004(a)(3).
(5) The state shall conduct air quality modeling that meets the requirements of § 51.1011(b) and that accounts for emissions reductions due to control measures needed to meet the annual reduction requirement of 5 percent of direct PM
(d) The state shall adopt control measures, including control technologies, on sources of direct PM
(e) For new or revised source emissions limitations on sources of direct PM
§ 51.1011 - Attainment demonstration and modeling requirements.
(a) Nonattainment areas initially classified as Moderate. The attainment demonstration due to the EPA as part of any Moderate area attainment plan required under § 51.1003(a) shall meet all of the following criteria:
(1) The attainment demonstration shall show the projected attainment date for the Moderate nonattainment area that is as expeditious as practicable in accordance with the requirements of § 51.1004(a)(1).
(2) The attainment demonstration shall meet the requirements of Appendix W of this part and shall include inventory data, modeling results, and emission reduction analyses on which the state has based its projected attainment date.
(3) The base year for the emissions inventory required for an attainment demonstration under this paragraph shall be one of the 3 years used for designations or another technically appropriate inventory year if justified by the state in the plan submission.
(4) The control strategies modeled as part of the attainment demonstration shall be consistent with the following as applicable:
(i) For a Moderate area that can demonstrate attainment of the applicable PM
(ii) For a Moderate area that cannot practicably attain the applicable PM
(5) Required time frame for obtaining emissions reductions. For each Moderate nonattainment area, the attainment plan must provide for implementation of all control measures needed for attainment as expeditiously as practicable. All control measures in the attainment demonstration must be implemented no later than the beginning of the year containing the applicable attainment date, notwithstanding RACM implementation deadline requirements in § 51.1009.
(b) Nonattainment areas reclassified as Serious. The attainment demonstration due to the EPA as part of a Serious area attainment plan required under § 51.1003(b) or (c) shall meet all of the following criteria:
(1) The attainment demonstration shall show the projected attainment date for the Serious nonattainment area that is as expeditious as practicable.
(2) The attainment demonstration shall meet the requirements of Appendix W of this part and shall include inventory data, modeling results, and emission reduction analyses on which the state has based its projected attainment date.
(3) The base year for the emissions inventories required for attainment demonstrations under this paragraph shall be one of the 3 years used for designations or another technically appropriate inventory year if justified by the state in the plan submission.
(4) The control strategies modeled as part of a Serious area attainment demonstration shall be consistent with the control strategies required pursuant to § 51.1003 and § 51.1010.
(5) Required timeframe for obtaining emissions reductions. For each Serious nonattainment area, the attainment plan must provide for implementation of all control measures needed for attainment as expeditiously as practicable. All control measures must be implemented no later than the beginning of the year containing the applicable attainment date, notwithstanding BACM implementation deadline requirements in § 51.1010.
§ 51.1012 - Reasonable further progress (RFP) requirements.
(a) Each attainment plan for a PM
(1) A schedule describing the implementation of control measures during each year of the applicable attainment plan. Control measures for Moderate area attainment plans are required in § 51.1009, and control measures for Serious area attainment plans are required in § 51.1010.
(2) RFP projected emissions for direct PM
(3) An analysis that presents the schedule of control measures and estimated emissions changes to be achieved by each milestone year, and that demonstrates that the control strategy will achieve reasonable progress toward attainment between the applicable base year and the attainment year. The analysis shall rely on information from the base year inventory for the nonattainment area required in § 51.1008(a)(1) and the attainment projected inventory for the nonattainment area required in § 51.1008(a)(2), in addition to the RFP projected emissions required in paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
(4) An analysis that demonstrates that by the end of the calendar year for each milestone date for the area determined in accordance with § 51.1013(a), pollutant emissions will be at levels that reflect either generally linear progress or stepwise progress in reducing emissions on an annual basis between the base year and the attainment year. A demonstration of stepwise progress must be accompanied by appropriate justification for the selected implementation schedule.
(5) At the state's election, an analysis that identifies air quality targets associated with the RFP projected emissions identified for the milestone years at the design value monitor locations.
(b) For a multi-state or multi-jurisdictional nonattainment area, the RFP plans for each state represented in the nonattainment area shall demonstrate RFP on the basis of common multi-state inventories. The states or jurisdictions within which the area is located must provide a coordinated RFP plan. Each state in a multi-state nonattainment area must ensure that the sources within its boundaries comply with enforceable emission levels and other requirements that in combination with the reductions planned in other state(s) within the nonattainment area will provide for attainment as expeditiously as practicable and demonstrate RFP consistent with these regulations.
§ 51.1013 - Quantitative milestone requirements.
(a) Consistent with CAA section 189(c)(1), the state must submit in each attainment plan for a PM
(1) Nonattainment areas initially classified as Moderate. (i) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, each attainment plan submittal for a Moderate PM
(ii) The plan shall contain quantitative milestones to be achieved by the milestone dates specified in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this section, as applicable, and that provide for objective evaluation of reasonable further progress toward timely attainment of the applicable PM
(2) Nonattainment areas reclassified as Serious. (i) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, each attainment plan submission that demonstrates that a Serious PM
(ii) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, each attainment plan submission that demonstrates that a Serious PM
(iii) The plan shall contain quantitative milestones to be achieved by the milestone dates specified in paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (ii) of this section, as applicable, and that provide for objective evaluation of reasonable further progress toward timely attainment of the applicable PM
(3) Serious areas that fail to attain by the applicable Serious area attainment date. (i) Except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section, each attainment plan submission for a Serious area that failed to attain a particular PM
(A) If the attainment plan is due prior to a date 13.5 years from designation of the area, then the plan shall contain milestones to be achieved by no later than a milestone date of 13.5 years from the date of designation of the area, and every 3 years thereafter, until the milestone date that falls within 3 years after the applicable attainment date.
(B) If the attainment plan is due later than a date 13.5 years from designation of the area, then the plan shall contain milestones to be achieved by no later than a milestone date of 16.5 years from the date of designation of the area, and every 3 years thereafter, until the milestone date that falls within 3 years after the applicable attainment date.
(ii) The plan shall contain quantitative milestones to be achieved by the milestone dates for the area, and that provide for objective evaluation of reasonable further progress toward timely attainment of the applicable PM
(4) Each attainment plan submission for an area designated nonattainment for the 1997 and/or 2006 PM
(b) Not later than 90 days after the date on which a milestone applicable to a PM
(1) A certification by the Governor or Governor's designee that the SIP control strategy is being implemented consistent with the RFP plan, as described in the applicable attainment plan;
(2) Technical support, including calculations, sufficient to document completion statistics for appropriate milestones and to demonstrate that the quantitative milestones have been satisfied and how the emissions reductions achieved to date compare to those required or scheduled to meet RFP; and,
(3) A discussion of whether the area will attain the applicable PM
(c) If a state fails to submit a milestone report by the date specified in paragraph (b) of this section, the Administrator shall require the state to submit, within 9 months after such failure, a plan revision that assures that the area will achieve the next milestone or attain the applicable NAAQS by the applicable date, whichever is earlier. If the Administrator determines that an area has not met any applicable milestone by the milestone date, the state shall submit, within 9 months after such determination, a plan revision that assures that the area will achieve the next milestone or attain the applicable NAAQS by the applicable date, whichever is earlier.
§ 51.1014 - Contingency measure requirements.
(a) The state must include as part of each attainment plan submitted under this subpart for a PM
(1) To meet any RFP requirement in an attainment plan approved in accordance with § 51.1012;
(2) To meet any quantitative milestone in an attainment plan approved in accordance with § 51.1013;
(3) To submit a quantitative milestone report required under § 51.1013(b); or,
(4) To attain the applicable PM
(b) The contingency measures adopted as part of a PM
(1) The contingency measures shall consist of control measures that are not otherwise included in the control strategy or that achieve emissions reductions not otherwise relied upon in the control strategy for the area; and,
(2) Each contingency measure shall specify the timeframe within which its requirements become effective following a determination by the Administrator under paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) The attainment plan submission shall contain a description of the specific trigger mechanisms for the contingency measures and specify a schedule for implementation.
§ 51.1015 - Clean data requirements.
(a) Nonattainment areas initially classified as Moderate. Upon a determination by the EPA that a Moderate PM
(1) The area is redesignated to attainment, after which such requirements are permanently discharged; or,
(2) The EPA determines that the area has re-violated the PM
(b) Nonattainment areas reclassified as Serious. Upon a determination by the EPA that a Serious PM
(1) The area is redesignated to attainment, after which such requirements are permanently discharged; or,
(2) The EPA determines that the area has re-violated the PM
§ 51.1016 - Continued applicability of the FIP and SIP requirements pertaining to interstate transport under CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and (ii) after revocation of the 1997 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS.
All control requirements associated with a FIP or approved SIP in effect for an area pursuant to obligations arising from CAA section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) and (ii) as of October 24, 2016, such as the CAIR or the CSAPR, shall continue to apply after revocation of the 1997 primary annual PM