Editorial Notes
Amendments

2015—Puspan. L. 114–110, § 3(a)(3), renumbered section 701 of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Puspan. L. 114–110, § 3(span), added subsec. (a) and struck out former subsec. (a). Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “There is hereby established within the Department of Transportation the Surface Transportation Board.”

Subsec. (span)(1). Puspan. L. 114–110, § 4(a)(1), substituted “5 members” for “3 members” and “3 members” for “2 members”.

Subsec. (span)(2). Puspan. L. 114–110, § 4(a)(2), added par. (2) and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: “At any given time, at least 2 members of the Board shall be individuals with professional standing and demonstrated knowledge in the fields of transportation or transportation regulation, and at least one member shall be an individual with professional or business experience (including agriculture) in the private sector.”

Subsec. (span)(4). Puspan. L. 114–110, § 4(span)(3), struck out “who becomes a member of the Board pursuant to paragraph (4), or an individual” after “In the case of an individual”.

Puspan. L. 114–110, § 4(span)(1), (2), redesignated par. (5) as (4) and struck out former par. (4) which read as follows: “On January 1, 1996, the members of the Interstate Commerce Commission serving unexpired terms on December 29, 1995, shall become members of the Board, to serve for a period of time equal to the remainder of the term for which they were originally appointed to the Interstate Commerce Commission. Any member of the Interstate Commerce Commission whose term expires on December 31, 1995, shall become a member of the Board, subject to paragraph (3).”

Subsec. (span)(5), (6). Puspan. L. 114–110, § 4(span)(2), redesignated pars. (6) and (7) as (5) and (6), respectively. Former par. (5) redesignated (4).

1996—Subsec. (span)(4). Puspan. L. 104–287 substituted “January 1, 1996” for “the effective date of this section” and “December 29, 1995,” for “the date of the enactment of the ICC Termination Act of 1995”.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date

Puspan. L. 104–88, § 2, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 804, provided that: “Except as otherwise provided in this Act [see Tables for classification], this Act shall take effect on January 1, 1996.”

Savings Provision

Puspan. L. 104–88, title II, § 204, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 941, provided that:

“(a)Legal Documents.—All orders, determinations, rules, regulations, permits, grants, loans, contracts, agreements, certificates, licenses, and privileges—
“(1) that have been issued, made, granted, or allowed to become effective by the Interstate Commerce Commission, any officer or employee of the Interstate Commerce Commission, or any other Government official, or by a court of competent jurisdiction, in the performance of any function that is transferred by this Act [see Tables for classification] or the amendments made by this Act; and
“(2) that are in effect on the effective date of such transfer (or become effective after such date pursuant to their terms as in effect on such effective date),
shall continue in effect according to their terms until modified, terminated, superseded, set aside, or revoked in accordance with law by the Board [Surface Transportation Board], any other authorized official, a court of competent jurisdiction, or operation of law. The Board shall promptly rescind all regulations established by the Interstate Commerce Commission that are based on provisions of law repealed and not substantively reenacted by this Act.
“(span)Proceedings.—
(1) The provisions of this Act shall not affect any proceedings or any application for any license pending before the Interstate Commerce Commission at the time this Act takes effect [see Effective Date note above], insofar as those functions are retained and transferred by this Act; but such proceedings and applications, to the extent that they relate to functions so transferred, shall be continued. Orders shall be issued in such proceedings, appeals shall be taken therefrom, and payments shall be made pursuant to such orders, as if this Act had not been enacted; and orders issued in any such proceedings shall continue in effect until modified, terminated, superseded, or revoked by a duly authorized official, by a court of competent jurisdiction, or by operation of law. Nothing in this subsection shall be deemed to prohibit the discontinuance or modification of any such proceeding under the same terms and conditions and to the same extent that such proceeding could have been discontinued or modified if this Act had not been enacted.
“(2) The Board and the Secretary are authorized to provide for the orderly transfer of pending proceedings from the Interstate Commerce Commission.
“(3)
(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), in the case of a proceeding under a provision of law repeal [repealed], and not reenacted, by this Act such proceeding shall be terminated.
“(B) Any proceeding involving a pipeline carrier under subtitle IV of title 49, United States Code, shall be continued to be heard by the Board under such subtitle, as in effect on the day before the effective date of this section [see Effective Date note above], until completion of such proceeding.
“(C) Any proceeding involving the merger of a motor carrier property under subtitle IV of title 49, United States Code, shall continue to be heard by the Board under such subtitle, as in effect on the day before the effective date of this section, until completion of such proceeding.
“(4) Any proceeding with respect to any tariff, rate charge, classification, rule, regulation, or service that was pending under the Intercoastal Shipping Act, 1933 [former 46 U.S.C. App. 843 et seq.] or the Shipping Act, 1916 [former 46 U.S.C. App. 801 et seq., see Disposition Table preceding section 101 of Title 46, Shipping] before the Federal Maritime Commission on November 1, 1995, shall continue to be heard until completion or issuance of a final order thereon under all applicable laws in effect as of November 1, 1995.
“(c)Suits.—
(1) This Act shall not affect suits commenced before the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 29, 1995], except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (3). In all such suits, proceeding shall be had, appeals taken, and judgments rendered in the same manner and with the same effect as if this Act had not been enacted.
“(2) Any suit by or against the Interstate Commerce Commission begun before the effective date of this Act shall be continued, insofar as it involves a function retained and transferred under this Act, with the Board (to the extent the suit involves functions transferred to the Board under this Act) or the Secretary (to the extent the suit involves functions transferred to the Secretary under this Act) substituted for the Commission.
“(3) If the court in a suit described in paragraph (1) remands a case to the Board or the Secretary, subsequent proceedings related to such case shall proceed in accordance with applicable law and regulations as in effect at the time of such subsequent proceedings.
“(d)Continuance of Actions Against Officers.—No suit, action, or other proceeding commenced by or against any officer in his official capacity as an officer of the Interstate Commerce Commission shall abate by reason of the enactment of this Act. No cause of action by or against the Interstate Commerce Commission, or by or against any officer thereof in his official capacity, shall abate by reason of enactment of this Act.
“(e)Exercise of Authorities.—Except as otherwise provided by law, an officer or employee of the Board may, for purposes of performing a function transferred by this Act or the amendments made by this Act, exercise all authorities under any other provision of law that were available with respect to the performance of that function to the official responsible for the performance of the function immediately before the effective date of the transfer of the function under this Act or the amendments made by this Act.”

Construction

Puspan. L. 114–110, § 17, Dec. 18, 2015, 129 Stat. 2238, provided that: “Nothing in this Act [see Tables for classification] may be construed to affect any suit commenced by or against the Surface Transportation Board, or any proceeding or challenge pending before the Surface Transportation Board, before the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 18, 2015].”

Abolition of Interstate Commerce Commission

Puspan. L. 104–88, title I, § 101, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 804, provided that: “The Interstate Commerce Commission is abolished.”

Organization of Functions of Surface Transportation Board

Puspan. L. 104–88, title II, § 202, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 940, provided that: “The Chairman of the Surface Transportation Board (in this Act [see Tables for classification] referred to as the ‘Board’) may allocate or reallocate any function of the Board, consistent with this title [see Tables for classification] and [former] subchapter I of chapter 7 [now 49 U.S.C. 1301 et seq.], as amended by section 201 of this title, among the members or employees of the Board, and may establish, consolidate, alter, or discontinue in the Board any organizational entities that were entities of the Interstate Commerce Commission, as the Chairman considers necessary or appropriate.”

Transfer of Assets and Personnel

Puspan. L. 104–88, title II, § 203, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 941, provided that:

“(a)To Board.—Except as otherwise provided in this Act [see Tables for classification] and the amendments made by this Act, those personnel, property, and records employed, used, held, available, or to be made available in connection with a function transferred to the Board [Surface Transportation Board] by this Act shall be transferred to the Board for use in connection with the functions transferred, and unexpended balances of appropriations, allocations, and other funds of the Interstate Commerce Commission shall also be transferred to the Board. Such unexpended balances, allocations, and other funds, together with any unobligated balances from user fees collected by the Commission during fiscal year 1996, may be used to pay for the closedown of the Commission and severance costs for Commission personnel, regardless of whether those costs are incurred at the Commission or at the Board.
“(span)To Secretary.—Except as otherwise provided in this Act and the amendments made by this Act, those personnel, property, and records employed, used, held, available, or to be made available in connection with a function transferred to the Secretary by this Act shall be transferred to the Secretary for use in connection with the functions transferred.
“(c)Separated Employees.—Notwithstanding all other laws and regulations, the Department of Transportation shall place all Interstate Commerce Commission employees separated from the Commission as a result of this Act on the DOT reemployment priority list (competitive service) or the priority employment list (excepted service).”

References to Interstate Commerce Commission Deemed To Be References to Surface Transportation Board

Puspan. L. 104–88, title II, § 205, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 943, provided that: “Any reference to the Interstate Commerce Commission in any other Federal law, Executive order, rule, regulation, or delegation of authority, or any document of or pertaining to the Interstate Commerce Commission or an officer or employee of the Interstate Commerce Commission, is deemed to refer to the Board [Surface Transportation Board], a member or employee of the Board, or the Secretary, as appropriate.”

Surface Transportation Board Passenger Rail Program

Puspan. L. 117–58, div. B, title II, § 22309, Nov. 15, 2021, 135 Stat. 734, provided that: “The Surface Transportation Board shall—

“(1) establish a passenger rail program with primary responsibility for carrying out the Board’s passenger rail responsibilities; and
“(2) hire up to 10 additional full-time employees to assist in carrying out the responsibilities referred to in paragraph (1).”

Information Security Improvement

Puspan. L. 115–269, Oct. 16, 2018, 132 Stat. 3763, provided that:

“SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

“This Act may be cited as the ‘STB Information Security Improvement Act’.

“SEC. 2. REQUIREMENTS.
“(a)In General.—The Surface Transportation Board (in this section referred to as the ‘STB’) shall develop a timeline and plan to implement the recommendations of the Inspector General of the Department of Transportation in Report No. FI2018002, including improvements—
“(1) to identify controls, including risk management, weakness remediation, and security authorization;
“(2) to protect controls, including configuration management, user identity and access management, and security training;
“(3) to detect controls, including continuous monitoring;
“(4) to respond [to] controls, including incident handling and reporting;
“(5) to recover controls for contingency planning; and
“(6) [sic] any additional tools that will improve the implementation of the recommendations.
“(span)Implementation.—
“(1)In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 16, 2018], the STB shall submit the plan and timeline developed under subsection (a) to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Commerce of the Senate.
“(2)Report.—The STB shall report annually to such Committees on the progress on implementation of the recommendations until the implementation is complete.
“(3)Plan implementation.—The STB shall designate an individual to implement the plan developed under subsection (a).
“SEC. 3. NO ADDITIONAL FUNDS AUTHORIZED.

“No additional funds are authorized to carry out the requirements of this Act. Such requirements shall be carried out using amounts otherwise authorized.”