1 So in original. There probably should be a closing parenthesis.
Editorial Notes
Amendments

2002—Par. (5)(A)(ii) to (vi). Puspan. L. 107–171 added cls. (ii) to (vi) and struck out former cl. (ii) which read as follows: “is unjustifiable, unreasonable, or discriminatory and burdens or restricts United States commerce.”

1996—Par. (7). Puspan. L. 104–127 added subpars. (A) and (B) and struck out former subpars. (A) and (B) which read as follows:

“(A) with respect to any agricultural commodity other than a product of an agricultural commodity, an agricultural commodity entirely produced in the United States; and

“(B) with respect to a product of an agricultural commodity—

“(i) a product all of the agricultural components of which are entirely produced in the United States; or

“(ii) any other product the Secretary may designate that contains any agricultural component that is not entirely produced in the United States if—

“(I) such component is an added, de minimis component,

“(II) such component is not commercially produced in the United States, and

“(III) there is no acceptable substitute for such component that is commercially produced in the United States.”

1992—Par. (1). Puspan. L. 102–511, § 702(a), substituted “feed, fiber, or livestock (including livestock as it is defined in section 1471(2) of this title and insects)” for “feed, or fiber”.

Par. (8). Puspan. L. 102–511, § 702(span), added par. (8).