Editorial Notes
References in TextThe Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, referred to in subsec. (a), is not set out in the Code. See Publication of Harmonized Tariff Schedule note set out under section 1202 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
Amendments2008—Subsec. (a)(2). Puspan. L. 110–314, § 216(span), amended par. (2) generally. Prior to amendment, par. (2) read as follows: “is not accompanied by a certificate required by section 2063 of this title, or is not labeled in accordance with regulations under section 2063(c) of this title;”.
Subsec. (e). Puspan. L. 110–314, § 223(span), amended subsec. (e) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “Products refused admission into the customs territory of the United States under this section must be exported, except that upon application, the Secretary of the Treasury may permit the destruction of the product in lieu of exportation. If the owner or consignee does not export the product within a reasonable time, the Department of the Treasury may destroy the product.”
Subsec. (g). Puspan. L. 110–314, § 223(c)(1), amended subsec. (g) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “The Commission may, by rule, condition the importation of a consumer product on the manufacturer’s compliance with the inspection and recordkeeping requirements of this chapter and the Commission’s rules with respect to such requirements.”
Subsec. (h)(3). Puspan. L. 110–314, § 235(c)(6), substituted “the appropriate Congressional committees” for “the Congress”.
1990—Subsec. (h). Puspan. L. 101–608 added subsec. (h).
1988—Subsec. (a). Puspan. L. 100–418 substituted “general note 2 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States” for “general headnote 2 to the Tariff Schedules of the United States”.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2008 AmendmentAmendment by sections 216(span) and 223(span) of Puspan. L. 110–314 effective on the date that is 30 days after Aug. 14, 2008, see section 239(a) of Puspan. L. 110–314, set out as a note under section 2051 of this title.
Effective Date of 1988 AmendmentAmendment by Puspan. L. 100–418 effective Jan. 1, 1989, and applicable with respect to articles entered on or after such date, see section 1217(span)(1) of Puspan. L. 100–418, set out as an Effective Date note under section 3001 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
Effective DateSection effective on the sixtieth day following Oct. 27, 1972, see section 34 of Puspan. L. 92–573, set out as a note under section 2051 of this title.
Funding for Consumer Product Safety Fund To Protect Consumers From Potentially Dangerous Products Related to COVID–19Puspan. L. 117–2, title VII, § 7401, Mar. 11, 2021, 135 Stat. 108, provided that:“(a)Appropriation.—In addition to amounts otherwise available, there is appropriated to the Consumer Product Safety Commission for fiscal year 2021, out of any money in the Treasury not otherwise appropriated, $50,000,000, to remain available until September 30, 2026, for the purposes described in subsection (span).
“(span)Purposes.—The funds made available in subsection (a) shall only be used for purposes of the Consumer Product Safety Commission to—“(1) carry out the requirements in title XX of division FF of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (Public Law 116–260) [consisting only of section 2001, set out as a note below];
“(2) enhance targeting, surveillance, and screening of consumer products, particularly COVID–19 products, entering the United States at ports of entry, including ports of entry for de minimis shipments;
“(3) enhance monitoring of internet websites for the offering for sale of new and used violative consumer products, particularly COVID–19 products, and coordination with retail and resale websites to improve identification and elimination of listings of such products;
“(4) increase awareness and communication particularly of COVID–19 product related risks and other consumer product safety information; and
“(5) improve the Commission’s data collection and analysis system especially with a focus on consumer product safety risks resulting from the COVID–19 pandemic to socially disadvantaged individuals and other vulnerable populations.
“(c)Definitions.—In this section—“(1) the term ‘Commission’ means the Consumer Product Safety Commission;
“(2) the term ‘violative consumer products’ means consumer products in violation of an applicable consumer product safety standard under the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2051 et seq.) or any similar rule, regulation, standard, or ban under any other Act enforced by the Commission; “(3) the term ‘COVID–19 emergency period’ means the period during which a public health emergency declared pursuant to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d) with respect to the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID–19), including under any renewal of such declaration, is in effect; and “(4) the term ‘COVID–19 products’ means consumer products, as defined by section 3(a)(5) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(5)), whose risks have been significantly affected by COVID–19 or whose sales have materially increased during the COVID–19 emergency period as a result of the COVID–19 pandemic.”
Port Surveillance During the COVID–19 PandemicPuspan. L. 116–260, div. FF, title XX, § 2001, Dec. 27, 2020, 134 Stat. 3301, provided that:“(a)CPSC Surveillance Personnel During the COVID–19 Pandemic.—For the duration of a public health emergency declared pursuant to section 319 of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 247d) as a result of confirmed cases of 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID–19), including any renewal thereof, the Commission shall ensure, to the maximum extent feasible, that investigators are stationed at ports of entry to protect the public against unreasonable risk of injury from consumer products, with the goal of covering no fewer than 90 percent of all consumer products entering the United States that are risk-scored in the Risk Assessment Methodology system. The Commission shall consult with United States Customs and Border Protection, and other relevant agencies, including health and safety agencies, on methods to safely staff ports during the pandemic. “(span)Additional CPSC Surveillance Personnel at Key Ports of Entry.—The Commission shall hire, train, and assign not fewer than 16 additional full-time equivalent personnel to be stationed at or supporting efforts at ports of entry, including ports of entry for de minimis shipments, for the purpose of identifying, assessing, and addressing shipments of violative consumer products. Such hiring shall continue during each fiscal year until the total number of full-time equivalent personnel equals and sustains the staffing requirements identified in the report to Congress required under subsection (c)(2)(F).
“(c)Report to Congress.—“(1)In general.—Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this section [Dec. 27, 2020], the Commission shall transmit to Congress, and make publicly available, a study and report assessing the risk to consumers associated with the reduction in Commission port inspection activity during the COVID–19 pandemic and the targeting and screening of de minimis shipments.
“(2)Report requirements.—In the study and report, the Commission shall—“(A) identify—“(i) the risks associated with the reduction in Commission port inspection activity during the COVID–19 pandemic;
“(ii) the extent to which the reduction in port inspection activity is linked to inadequate Commission resources or due to shortages of trained Commission staff due to the COVID–19 pandemic; and
“(iii) the steps the Commission has taken and plans to take to mitigate those risks, such as recalls, inspections of product inventory, consumer warnings, and other appropriate measures;
“(B) examine a sampling of de minimis shipments at a sufficient and representative sample of all types of ports of entry where de minimis shipments are processed, including express consignment carrier facilities, international mail facilities, and air cargo facilities to assess the extent to which such shipments include violative consumer products;
“(C) examine a sampling of shipments coming from countries identified as high-risk for exporting violative consumer products to identify trends associated with the shipment of products containing both intellectual property rights infringements and consumer product safety violations;
“(D) detail plans and timelines to effectively address targeting and screening of de minimis shipments to prevent the entry of violative consumer products entering into the commerce of the United States taking into consideration projected growth in e-commerce;
“(E) establish metrics by which to evaluate the effectiveness of the Commission efforts to reduce the number of de minimis shipments containing violative consumer products from entering into the commerce of the United States; and
“(F) assess projected technology and resources, including staffing requirements necessary to implement such plans based on available and needed Commission resources.
“(d)Definitions.—In this section—“(1) the term ‘Commission’ means the Consumer Product Safety Commission;
“(2) the term ‘de minimis shipments’ means articles containing consumer products entering the United States under the de minimis value exemption in 19 U.S.C. 1321(a)(2)(C); “(3) the term ‘ports of entry for de minimis shipments’ means environments where de minimis shipments are processed, including express consignment carrier facilities, international mail facilities, and air cargo facilities; and
“(4) the term ‘violative consumer products’ means consumer products in violation of an applicable consumer product safety rule under the Consumer Product Safety Act [15 U.S.C. 2051 et seq.] or any similar rule, regulation, standard, or ban under any other Act enforced by the Commission. “(e)Savings Clause.—Nothing in this section shall be construed to limit, affect, or conflict with any other authority of the Commission or any other statutory requirements governing the Commission.”
Import Safety Management and Interagency CooperationPuspan. L. 110–314, title II, § 222, Aug. 14, 2008, 122 Stat. 3066, provided that:“(a)Risk Assessment Methodology.—Not later than 2 years after the date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 14, 2008], the Commission shall develop a risk assessment methodology for the identification of shipments of consumer products that are—“(1) intended for import into the United States; and
“(2) likely to include consumer products in violation of section 17(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2066(a)) or other import provisions enforced by the Commission. “(span)Use of International Trade Data System and Other Databases.—In developing the methodology required under subsection (a), the Commission shall—“(1) provide for the use of the International Trade Data System, insofar as is practicable, established under section 411(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1411(d)) to evaluate and assess information about shipments of consumer products intended for import into the customs territory of the United States; “(2) incorporate the risk assessment methodology required under this section into its information technology modernization plan;
“(3) examine, in consultation with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, how to share information collected and retained by the Commission, including information in the database required under section 6A of the Consumer Product Safety Act [15 U.S.C. 2055a], for the purpose of identifying shipments of consumer products in violation of section 17(a) of such Act (15 U.S.C. 2066(a)) or other import provisions enforced by the Commission; and “(4) examine, in consultation with U.S. Customs and Border Protection, how to share information required by section 15(j) of the CPSA [15 U.S.C. 2064(j)] as added by section 223 of this Act for the purpose of identifying shipments of consumer products in violation of section 17(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2066(a)) or other import provisions enforced by the Commission. “(c)Cooperation With U.S. Customs and Border Protection.—Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act [Aug. 14, 2008], the Commission shall develop a plan for sharing information and coordinating with U.S. Customs and Border Protection that considers, at a minimum, the following:“(1) The number of full-time equivalent personnel employed by the Commission that should be stationed at U.S. ports of entry for the purpose of identifying shipments of consumer products that are in violation of section 17(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2066(a)) or other import provisions enforced by the Commission. “(2) The extent and nature of cooperation between the Commission and U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel stationed at ports of entry in the identification of shipments of consumer product that are in violation of section 17(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2066(a)) or other import provisions enforced by the Commission under this Act [see Short Title of 2008 Amendment note set out under section 2051 of this title] or any other provision of law. “(3) The number of full-time equivalent personnel employed by the Commission that should be stationed at the National Targeting Center (or its equivalent) of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, including—“(A) the extent and nature of cooperation between Commission and U.S. Customs and Border Protection personnel stationed at the National Targeting Center (or its equivalent), as well as at United States ports of entry;
“(B) the responsibilities of Commission personnel assigned to the National Targeting Center (or its equivalent) under subsection (span)(3); and
“(C) whether the information available at the National Targeting Center (or its equivalent) would be useful to the Commission or U.S. Customs and Border Protection in identifying the consumer products described in subsection (a).
“(4) The development of rule sets for the Automated Targeting System and expedited access for the Commission to the Automated Targeting System.
“(5) The information and resources necessary for the development, updating, and effective implementation of the risk assessment methodology required in subsection (a).
“(d)Report to Congress.—Not later than 180 days after completion of the risk assessment methodology required under this section, the Commission shall submit a report to the appropriate Congressional committees concerning, at a minimum, the following:“(1) The Commission’s plan for implementing the risk assessment methodology required under this section.
“(2) The changes made or necessary to be made to the Commission’s memorandum of understanding with U.S. Customs and Border Protection.
“(3) The status of—“(A) the development of the Automated Targeting System rule set required under subsection (c)(4) of this section;
“(B) the Commission’s access to the Automated Targeting System; and
“(C) the effectiveness of the International Trade Data System in enhancing cooperation between the Commission and U.S. Customs and Border Protection for the purpose of identifying shipments of consumer products in violation of section 17(a) of the Consumer Product Safety Act (15 U.S.C. 2066(a)) or other import provisions enforced by the Commission; “(4) Whether the Commission requires additional statutory authority under the Consumer Product Safety Act [15 U.S.C. 2051 et seq.], the Federal Hazardous Substances Act [15 U.S.C. 1261 et seq.], the Flammable Fabrics Act [15 U.S.C. 1191 et seq.], or the Poison Prevention Packaging Act of 1970 [15 U.S.C. 1471 et seq.] in order to implement the risk assessment methodology required under this section. “(5) The level of appropriations necessary to implement the risk assessment methodology required under this section.”
[For definitions of “Commission” and “appropriate Congressional committees” used in section 222 of Puspan. L. 110–314, set out above, see section 2(a) of Puspan. L. 110–314, set out as a note under section 2051 of this title.]
